[ Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: April
http://www.underlo.com A tall adult lolita goes for a gyno exam and the nurse gives her a very thorough inspection. This hot is getting fucked in the ass by two hard cocks. Gorgeous lolita anetta keys playing with a huge cucumber. Three pages of naughty mpegs ladyboy whore with a hot secret. Big breasted lolita getting fucked. Pictures of mpegs sexy lolita with shaved pussy bound with ropes. Sandy strips and shows her perky lolita titties. A mpegs and curvy lolita poses for some mpegs photographs here. Sexiest lolita love doing watersports and will happily demonstrate their hot wet stream for you! Lolita beautie with big natural tits taking shower. Cock hungry milf sucking and fucking mpegs pizza deliverer. This lolita gets a massive bukkake facial as her wedding present Mpegs lolita squirting cum out of her pussy. Mpegs lesbians get wild licking and fingering each others pussies. Nasty teens lolita and two dicky gay studs arrange the wildest bi-party on the net. Pics of an mpegs showing off her mpegs body and soft boobs. Group of black men fuck a mpegs and indian lolita. Nasty asians lolita gets a deep hard anal thrashing in these movies. Auburn haired white gets mpegs and masturbates with her fingers and dildo. Sexy lesbian lolita poising mpegs on her bad. Mpegs chick with a hairy pussy pleasures herself with a vibrator.
From: nancy
Your last posting asks for a new argument instead of ìreactionary rhetoricî and that is exactly what I am trying to do. You are assuming I am only engaging in the pointless traditionalist vs. avant garde feud, and I am not. Those still attempting to practice 19th century salon sculpture, ignorant of 20th century inquiry, are producing boat anchors and I do not consider myself one of them. Certainly there is value in challenges and theories of the recent past, but those lines of inquiry were best explored over 50 years ago. (what artist working today says anything more powerful or different from Oppenheimís Fur Cup? Who today does anything truly more outrageous than Rausenberg?) Just as sad as someone who wonít let go of ìtraditionalî sculpture are those who wonít let go of the ìtraditionî of post-modernist shock confrontation, obtuse theorization and pointed denial of skill and beauty. I am not ìstubborn-headedî that art has not evolved, but perhaps you are stubborn headed that it cannot evolve further. And I do believe we have a solid footing on which to push against to gain ground.. the questions of beauty, skill and accessible meaning and the higher (or social) purpose of art. Again, contemporary art is not being rejected out of public ignorance, but out of public revulsion. Contemporary art does not resonate with or serve its society, but only itself. It is time to take all those inquiries and theories and challenges of the past 75 years and either set them aside or put them to service in solving the biggest problem facing art, social irrelevance. (at least in PUBLIC sculpture!) All the medical and scientific inquiries and advancements in the world are useless until they serves the common man, who does not need to understand, say, computer programming to APPRECIATE it. And what does the common man appreciate in art? Skill, beauty and meaning honest and relevant to him or her...an uplifting, engaging, resonant or spiritualizing experience....which, unfortunately, he or she can only find now in ìtraditionalî art and films. And unlike academics and cowed art mavens, the public does not want art one needs a BFA to understand...it wants art that can be appreciate by simply LOOKING at it.. modern life is complicated enough! (and confusing enough and ugly enough and cold hearted enough!) The public hunger for beauty and resonance has driven them for scraps to the likes of Chiluley and Kinkade, and the (gads!) collecting of Hummels. Instead of castigating the starving for their ignorance and ìbadî taste, I suggest we offer them what they truly crave and cannot find. Better to seem a wee bit esthetically backward (in the eyes of the Art Establishment) than to have lived and worked and contributed nothing to the social fabric that supports us all.